Resultados de la búsqueda:

>>969196
>TC consent es con audios, no con imágenes
Pero en general demuestra que es normal presentar respuestas sexual en hombres no pedofilos ante impulsos pedofilos
>no representa lo que sale en el gráfico que has mostrado
No exactamente pero muchas de las fuentes mencionadas en los estudios si apuntan a informacion similar y puede ser complementada con otros estudios que tambien muestran lo mismo como
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Briere/publication/20448796_University_males%27_sexual_interest_in_children_Predicting_potential_indices_of_pedophilia_in_a_nonforensic_sample/links/5bc44a1892851c88fd6a28c8/University-males-sexual-interest-in-children-Predicting-potential-indices-of-pedophilia-in-a-nonforensic-sample.pdf
>The current data offer strong support for the notion that male sexual response to children is relatively common in our society, even
among normal (non-incarcerated and nonclinical) males. Of the college male sample, 21 % admitted to at least some sexual attraction
to some small children; 9% reported fantasies about sex with a child; and over half of the latter group (5% of the total sample) stated
that they had masturbated at least once to such fantasies. Finally, 7% of this male sample indicated at least some likelihood of having
sex with a child were it possible to do so without detection or punishment. Given the probable social undesirability of such
admissions, we may hypothesize that the actual rates of child-focused sexual interest in this sample were even higher.
Que se compagina con la gráfica. hay otros estudios sobre el atractivo de los rostros que denotaba que lo atractivo tendía a gravitar hacia aquellos rostros cercanos a los 13 años pero no logro encontrarlo

>Aunque el concepto de "IQ mínimo para poder consentir" suena demasiado estúpido como para ser tomado en serio.
No se trata de ese concepto, se trata de medir objetivamente la capacidad mental necesaria para consentir